Sunday, December 08, 2019

Negligent Hiring – A mistake can cost more than just money!

Posted by OnCourse Staff July 21, 2011 5:40pm

Photo Credit: Chodra

Every executive I know has a few reoccurring nightmares.  As a Human Resources professional, I have a few as well.  My nightmare is this: I wake up on beautiful sunny morning and head to the kitchen for my favorite cup of coffee.  I still have on my pjs and slippers, and my dogs by my side.  I open my morning newspaper and there it is, right on page one.  It hits me between the eyes, like a bullet, and there is nothing I can do to stop it.  I drop my coffee mug, with the hot liquid burning my leg.  I look again at the first page of the newspaper and, in bold print splashed across the top, the headline reads: EMPLOYEE OF [YOUR COMPANY] ACCUSED OF…… that is when I wake up, in a panic and hoping that it was just a nightmare.  Sadly, for many firms, my nightmare is their reality.  There is a growing number of negligent hiring lawsuits, and the cost to firms is more than just monetary.  Reputational damage and loss of clients is just as big, if not a bigger concern.

The legal theory behind my nightmare is Negligent Hiring & Retention.  In a nutshell, negligent hiring is defined as: an injured party (this can be anyone, an employee, vendor, or customer) makes a claim against an employer claiming the employer should have known their employee was capable of committing the act. Negligent Retention is very similar to negligent hiring; the primary difference is keeping an employee after you have corporate knowledge of their bad behavioral tendencies.   Negligent hiring and retention can be summed up with the following scenarios:

  • You just hired a new VP of Lending.  She comes with impeccable credentials.  Your bank, in an effort to get her hired quickly, ignores its normal background checks and screening because, hey, she has the proper credentials and you need a VP of Lending.  She accepts the position and starts the following month.  One day, while meeting with a difficult client in her office, her temper rages and she causes harm to the client, enough harm that the client had to seek medical treatment.  A month later, the (now former) client sues your bank claiming that if you had conducted a proper background screening, you would have known she had a temper and was quietly terminated from her last two jobs due to violent outbursts. 
  • On his day off, one of your tellers walks into one of your branches and begins to harass customers in line. The teller, your employee, is agitated and starts yelling out libelous comments about the bank, its operations, and staff.  The security guard drags him out of the branch and on the way out the door, the agitated employee knocks over a senior citizen customer that has been a customer for years.  She is not seriously hurt but sues anyway, claiming the bank knew this employee was dangerous.  In her complaint, she states that, over the years of coming to the bank as a customer, she witnessed him verbally abusing other customers at his teller window.

Bringing a suit of negligent hiring/retention has three (3) key elements: (1) the employer did not exercise reasonable care in hiring the working, (2) the employee had/has dangerous tendencies, and (3) the employer placed the employee in a position that interacts in a manner where others can be injured.  Even though you can never prevent someone from bringing a claim against your organization, there are concrete steps firms can take to create a defense.  A central theme in my blogs is the application of any HR program requires application of the policies uniformly and consistently.  This is no different, consistent application is key.  A successful policy to avoid negligent hiring should consist of the following elements (it is advisable that you seek legal counsel concerning your organization-specific issues):

  1. Educate your interviewers to look for potential behavioral clues and on what background checks are required.
  2. Have each applicant fill out an application which is thoroughly reviewed.
  3. Question each applicant about the gaps in employment.  Get an accurate timeline of past employment and what happened during any periods of unemployment.
  4. Check references. 
  5. Ask about criminal convictions – this can be accomplished on the application. 
  6. Perform additional background checks appropriate for the position being sought.
  7. Conduct criminal convictions check on candidates who will be in positions that require access to customers, vendors, and sensitive information.
  8. Document all steps you take to investigate the candidate prior to hire.

Ignorance of past actions and behaviors is going to carry no water should you face a claim in court.  The best defense is to have a good, solid, consistent process that you implement and adhere to.  Your application is going to play a major part in your process because it the one of the first things the candidate fills out, generally before you interview them and it can give good insight into the applicants past.

Your application should be worded in a way to seek out past bad behaviors that will give you a more complete picture on the individual you are considering hiring.  You should specifically ask if the individual has been convicted of a crime (as with credit scores, this has started to become controversial so make sure you are not violating any state/local laws).  On your application, use the broadest language possible and include misdemeanors.  Misdemeanors might seem like smaller crimes but they can give you big clues in a person’s past and help predict future behaviors. Your application should include a disclaimer that conviction does not necessarily mean disqualification. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission threshold for rejecting a candidate because of past criminal conviction is the nature and gravity of the offense must significantly deter the applicant from performing the duties of the job or put others in danger.  If you interview a candidate for a teller position and they list a recent misdemeanor conviction for assault on their application, you might not want to hire that candidate as they might be a danger to others. Below is a sample application:

 

 

Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic

 

 

The application is a good starting point.  You still need to ensure that your interviewers are properly undergoing training to look for behaviors that indicate and/or predict behaviors that might lead to negligent hiring/retention issues.  Those types of questions were covered in my last blog in “Finding the Right Hire.”

I understand that the issues and examples raised in this blog post are somewhat extreme. However, with a growing frequency we read in the newspaper or see a story on the news about an employee that caused harm in the workplace.  Negligent hiring/retention claims can cost more than money; they can also cost you your reputation and clients.  The cost to implement a policy to guard against negligent hiring is much less than the money and reputational damage.  Can you take the risk?

 

Sources:

“4 Tips on How to Avoid Negligent Hiring Lawsuits/FYI Employee Background Screening” Found at: http://fyiscreening .com/4-tips-on-how-to-avoid-negligent-hiring-lawsuits/  Posted on June 29, 2011.

“Commonsense Actions Can Limit Negligent Hiring Claims” Found at: www.ppspublishers.com/articles/commonsense.htm

Daily, Jason.  “The Right Employment Application to Avoid Negligent Hiring Lawsuits.” Found at: http://blog.edpm.com.  Posted on May 31, 2011.

“Negligent Hiring Law & Legal Definition”  Found at: http://definitions.uslegal.com/n/negligent-hiring\

“What is Negligent Hiring?” Found at: http://www.nonprofitrisk.org/articles/employment091008.shtml.

 

Comments

Visitor
Re: Negligent Hiring – A mistake can cost more than just money! Reply #1 on : Wed July 27, 2011, 04:25:10
The cost to implement a policy to guard against negligent hiring is much less than the money and reputational damage.
Last Edit: July 27, 2011, 09:20:23 Reply to this comment Quote this comment

Add a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.



 Image

OnCourse Staff

The OnCourse writing staff work to keep you informed about the most pertinent financial industry news of the moment



OnCourse Staff's Posts Subscribe to RSS Feed



Flood Coverage – Still a Hot Regulatory Issue
Interagency Statement on Sharing BSA Resources and Challenges
New Jersey's Corporate Business Tax Legislation: A Look at the Impact for Banks
Correspondent Banking: The Challenges of Data Transparency
Regulation E and Business Account Errors
Controls over Employee and Officer T&E Expenses
Is Regulation CC Put on the Back Burner?
Training – An Investment and Risk Management Tool
Are You Gambling with Your BSA Program?
The Case of Foreign Banks and Heightened Scrutiny
IRS and New Jersey Tax Audits of Banks
State Taxation of Financial Institutions in Today's Environment
Does your 401(k) Plan need an Audit?
De-Risking of Foreign Correspondent Banks
Same Day ACH Credits – Phase One
FinCEN Finalizes Ruling on Beneficial Ownership and Ongoing Customer Due Diligence
Keep an Eye On Your Chip!
Is the IRS Status of your Defined Benefit plan in Jeopardy?
The Dilemma of Banking Medical Marijuana Businesses and Other Indirect Risks
Is your Institution Monitoring Working Capital Lines of Credit?
Financial Reporting and Regulatory Update on the Horizon
BSA/AML Training: Is your program effective?
Planning in a Consolidating Banking Industry
To opt-out or not to opt-out, that is the question – A reminder on March 31, 2015 Call Report, Schedule RC-R, item 3.a
Anti-Money Laundering – The Age of Technology
Top Compliance Topics Discussed at the NJ Bankers Compliance University
Some tips and tricks for dealing with Regulatory Examinations
Updated Regulation E Booklet from the OCC!
Is Flood Disaster Still on the Heat Map?
Have You Implemented Your Plan yet?
FDIC Consumer Newsletter
More Flood Insurance Changes...
Same Sex Married Couples - Ensuring Equal Treatment – Announcement from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Truth in Lending (Regulation Z) Annual Threshold Adjustments (CARD ACT, HOEPA and ATR/QM)
FFIEC Releases Revised BSA/AML Examination Manual: So what’s new?
OFAC Consolidates Non-SDN Listings
Coping with HOPA
Coping with the CFPB’s Ability-to-Repay Rule
ABA Survey on Impact of Dodd Frank Compliance
ABA Mortgage Origination Deskbook
Who handles Your Dormant Accounts?
Appraisal Disclosure Rule
Cybercriminals Broaden their Attacks in Social Networks
The Importance of Segregating a Bank’s Credit Function from its Lending Function
Appraisal Management Companies in Regulatory Crosshairs
All About the Home Owners Protection Act
Requesting Current Financial Information
Countdown to Windows XP End of Life and Support: Are you still at Risk?
314(b) Distinct Advantages for Financial Institutions
Where is the Document?
Building a Better Hen House
Ready the Ramparts! : IT Security and the Modern Bank
The Credit -- Er, IT Crisis?
Keeping the Balance: IT Security and the Org Chart
IT Security: "IT's" About Process
Wag the Dog
Consumerization of Technology and its influence on Information Security
Detective, Reactive and Preventive: Evolving Your IT Security
Do You Know The Security Features of the New $100 Bill?
Segregation of Duties for Wire Transfer Processing
How do you charge Early Withdrawal Fees on Time Deposits?
Do you still offer NOW Accounts?
Policy Changes Required – Do you Wait until Annual Approval?
Summarizing ACAMS White Paper on EDD and AML Risk Assessments (Industry Survey)
ACAMS to provide Free Webinar
ACBB Changes its Name
Who Do You Give Cash to?
ABA Briefing to Help Banks Address Cyber-security Threats
The OCC Issues Booklet: “A Common Sense Approach to Community Banking”
Safe Deposit Box Contents are not insured – But They COULD Be!
Allowance for Loan Loss Tips and Tricks
FDIC Can Review New Products
Let’s Talk About Overdrafts!
Community Banks Slowly Warm Up to Private Student Loans
Has your Bank updated the Adverse Action Notice?
Regulation E and NACHA Rules: When you Want to Stop Payment on a Recurring Debit
CFPB Stands Up Against Poor Debt Collection Practices
Don’t Forget the Small Stuff
Double Endorsed Checks: What is the Risk?
Social Media – Will the Regulators Do Spot Checks?
How Does Your Bank Handle Customer Requested Maintenance Changes?
OCC Releases Booklet on "Common Sense" Community Banking
New SAR Filing Updates
Is your BSA/AML automated monitoring system up to par?
The Importance of BSA Training
Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) introduces the OFAC SDN Fuzzy Logic Search Tool
Filing the New CTR Forms: What you need to Know
FFIEC Proposed Risk Management Guidance on Social Media: Beware and Prepare
Solutions to Reducing Dormant Accounts at Your Institution
Pandemic Preparedness: Are you testing your Pandemic Plan?
Regulation E Foreign Remittance Rules
FFIEC issues revised “Supervision of Technology Service Providers” booklet
Expiration of Unlimited Deposit Insurance for NIBTAs
Is Your Institution's Marketing UDAAP Compliant?
What is Enterprise Risk Management?
New OCC Guidance Released on Investor Owned Properties
Electronic Work Papers - Why P&G Made the Switch
OCC to Toughen Exams in Response to United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations
Clarifying Regulatory Obligations Regarding Continuing Activity SAR Filings
Federal Regulatory Agencies Proposal New Rule
Risk management - Smaller institutions and the benefits of ERM
Strengthening Your Loan Maintenance Monitoring
New Lending Proposal from CFPB
FDIC Reaches Settlement on Overdraft Fees
FRB Guidance on Foreclosures
Loan Denials and Withdrawals – Tips to Sure Up your Process
Regulation O – 5 Easy ways to avoid violations
The Summer of CFPB Proposals
Community Lenders Seize Market Share From Big Banks by Using Advanced Online Lending Technology
Dodd-Frank Rule to Change Legal Lending Limit Monitoring Requirements
The ABCs of a TDR
Supreme Court ruling for the Freeman, et al. v. Quicken Loans, Inc case
New FinCEN Guidance for CTR Aggregation for Businesses with Common Ownership (FIN – 2012 –G001)
Senior member of House of Financial Services Committee Introduces Overdraft Protection Act
FinCEN is looking to streamline the financial institution reporting process by issuing mandatory E-filing reporting requirements.
Curry: Operational Risk Now OCC’s Top Concern
JOBS Act Client Alert - Rules 506 of Regulation D
New Rules Proposal for Servicers Coming from the CFPB
Wall Street Receives Volcker Rule Clarity
De-stressing with stress testing
Banks Participate in Information Sharing to Battle Online Theft
IT security: Is your program still effective?
Banking Solutions: ALLL and GAAP in Agreement
How are the most recent regulatory enforcement trends that banks are facing today affecting internal audit? Why?
What are the most recent regulatory enforcement trends that banks are facing today?
Mobile banking: How do we get there?
UBS further struggles with $2 Billion loss by Rogue Trader
Capital One Becomes Dodd-Frank Test as Nation’s Fifth Largest Bank
Community Banks to receive US Funding for Small Businesses
FDIC fields questions about overdraft guidance
Negligent Hiring – A mistake can cost more than just money!
Regulatory Burden – Managing the Pain
From Embezzlement to Imprisonment: Former Citigroup employee faces charges with $19.2 million in bank fraud
TDR or Not to TDR …Much Ado about Nothing?
Finding the Right Hire
Model behavior: Is your ALM model capturing your bank’s risks?
ALLL best practices: Pay attention to qualitative factors
Abandoned Property Law, and its new New York State of Mind
Consumerization of Technology and its influence on Information Security
FDIC releases Provisions on Dodd-Frank to help Community Banks
Social Media in the Employment Arena – It Gets Funky!
The Proof is in the Pudding: Affects of Dodd-Frank on Community Banks
Banks and Businesses get "swiped" over Fees
A little bit of this, and a little bit of that: Fed Unveils list of Banks Helped during Financial Crisis of 2008
IT Security: "IT's" About Process
To Test or Not to Test; That is the Question
2011 Failed Bank List Hits 25
Wag the Dog
Committee on Financial Services to Hold Hearing on the Effects of Dodd-Frank on Small Biz and Banks Today
2011 Failed Bank List up to 18
A Culture of Whatever: On the Path to Proper Governance
The Test Drive: Leasing or Buying a HR IT Platform
Detective, Reactive and Preventive: Evolving Your IT Security
Cracking the ALLL Code: How to Develop the Right FAS 114 Methodology
Double Digits: Bank Closings up to 11 in 2011
FCIC Releases Report on the Causes of the Financial Crisis
Part of the In Crowd: Thoughts on the Dodd-Frank Act
Another One Bites the Dust: Regulators Close 4 Banks
Keeping the Balance: IT Security and the Org Chart
On Notice: FDIC Issues Rule for Temp Unlimited Deposit Insurance
2011 Failed Bank List Up to 3
Welcome to OnCourse
Stick 'Em Up!
Time for a Tune-Up: The Necessity of a HR Audit
Visa Instituting Two-Tiered Debit Card Interchange Structure
The First Failed Banks of 2011
The Credit -- Er, IT Crisis?
Painting a Masterpiece: The Art of the ALLL Reserve
The Law on Your Side: Understanding HR Regulations in 2011
Building a Better Hen House
Ready the Ramparts! : IT Security and the Modern Bank
No Respite from RESPA