Saturday, December 16, 2017

ALLL best practices: Pay attention to qualitative factors

Posted by OnCourse Staff May 18, 2011 3:35pm

Photo Credit: StefanG81

Staying on top of the allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) is critical for banks, especially in the current economy. If examiners find that your ALLL is underfunded, they may downgrade your bank’s CAMEL rating, require you to increase capital levels or take other remedial action.

One of the biggest challenges in calculating the ALLL is assessing the impact of qualitative, or “environmental,” factors. These are factors that cause your bank’s loss estimates to deviate from its historical loss experience. Interagency guidance provides a useful outline for this analysis, but will examiners expect you to go further?

Agencies issue guidance

Federal banking agencies published their Interagency Policy Statement on the ALLL in 2006. According to the policy statement, the starting point in measuring the ALLL is to “determine the historical loss rate for each group of loans with similar risk characteristics in its portfolio.” Next, management should consider qualitative factors likely to cause the bank’s estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. These factors include changes in:

  • Lending policies and procedures
  • Business conditions (on an international national, regional or local level)
  • Loan volume, terms or profiles
  • The lending staff’s experience, ability or depth
  • The volume or severity of problem loans
  • Loan review quality
  • Collateral values
  • Credit concentration levels

Banks also should consider other external factors, including competition and legal and regulatory requirements.

Examiners suggest best practices

In a recent SRC Insights article, “Qualitative Factors and the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses in Community Banks,” authors Sharon Wells and Trevor Gaskins, examiners with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, reported observing a number of weaknesses in banks’ ALLL methodologies. One of the biggest problems they saw was inadequate portfolio segmentation.

The interagency policy statement instructs banks to group loans with similar risk characteristics, but many banks segment their loan portfolios into overly broad categories, which may not accurately reflect underlying risk factors. Depending on a bank’s size, and the nature and scope of its lending activities, it may be appropriate to segment the loan portfolio into narrower categories.

Another area where banks fall short is the examination of qualitative factors. Too often, banks limit their analysis to the broad factors outlined in the policy statement. According to the authors, however, a best practice is to “prepare an institution-specific and customized risk assessment of each portfolio sector based upon the unique characteristics and loss drivers of that loan portfolio.” The article contains a detailed list of loss drivers that banks should consider in conducting their analyses.

Finally, the article warns banks that their valuation of qualitative factors affecting the ALLL must be supported, documented and not overly dependent on subjective opinion.

Review your ALLL methodology

To ensure that your bank’s ALLL is adequately funded, review your methodology in light of the guidance described above. Your advisors can help you design ALLL policies and procedures that accurately reflect your bank’s unique risk profile.

Comments

Add a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.



 Image

OnCourse Staff

The OnCourse writing staff work to keep you informed about the most pertinent financial industry news of the moment



OnCourse Staff's Posts Subscribe to RSS Feed



Training – An Investment and Risk Management Tool
Are You Gambling with Your BSA Program?
Does your 401(k) Plan need an Audit?
Same Day ACH Credits – Phase One
Is the IRS Status of your Defined Benefit plan in Jeopardy?
Is your Institution Monitoring Working Capital Lines of Credit?
Financial Reporting and Regulatory Update on the Horizon
Planning in a Consolidating Banking Industry
To opt-out or not to opt-out, that is the question – A reminder on March 31, 2015 Call Report, Schedule RC-R, item 3.a
Cybercriminals Broaden their Attacks in Social Networks
The Importance of Segregating a Bank’s Credit Function from its Lending Function
Requesting Current Financial Information
Countdown to Windows XP End of Life and Support: Are you still at Risk?
314(b) Distinct Advantages for Financial Institutions
Where is the Document?
Do You Know The Security Features of the New $100 Bill?
Segregation of Duties for Wire Transfer Processing
Community Banks Slowly Warm Up to Private Student Loans
Has your Bank updated the Adverse Action Notice?
How Does Your Bank Handle Customer Requested Maintenance Changes?
OCC Releases Booklet on "Common Sense" Community Banking
New SAR Filing Updates
The Importance of BSA Training
FFIEC Proposed Risk Management Guidance on Social Media: Beware and Prepare
Pandemic Preparedness: Are you testing your Pandemic Plan?
FFIEC issues revised “Supervision of Technology Service Providers” booklet
Is Your Institution's Marketing UDAAP Compliant?
Electronic Work Papers - Why P&G Made the Switch
Community Lenders Seize Market Share From Big Banks by Using Advanced Online Lending Technology
New FinCEN Guidance for CTR Aggregation for Businesses with Common Ownership (FIN – 2012 –G001)
Curry: Operational Risk Now OCC’s Top Concern
JOBS Act Client Alert - Rules 506 of Regulation D
Wall Street Receives Volcker Rule Clarity
De-stressing with stress testing
Banks Participate in Information Sharing to Battle Online Theft
IT security: Is your program still effective?
Mobile banking: How do we get there?
UBS further struggles with $2 Billion loss by Rogue Trader
Capital One Becomes Dodd-Frank Test as Nation’s Fifth Largest Bank
Community Banks to receive US Funding for Small Businesses
FDIC fields questions about overdraft guidance
Negligent Hiring – A mistake can cost more than just money!
From Embezzlement to Imprisonment: Former Citigroup employee faces charges with $19.2 million in bank fraud
Finding the Right Hire
Model behavior: Is your ALM model capturing your bank’s risks?
ALLL best practices: Pay attention to qualitative factors
Abandoned Property Law, and its new New York State of Mind
FDIC releases Provisions on Dodd-Frank to help Community Banks
Social Media in the Employment Arena – It Gets Funky!
Banks and Businesses get "swiped" over Fees
A little bit of this, and a little bit of that: Fed Unveils list of Banks Helped during Financial Crisis of 2008
To Test or Not to Test; That is the Question
2011 Failed Bank List Hits 25
Committee on Financial Services to Hold Hearing on the Effects of Dodd-Frank on Small Biz and Banks Today
2011 Failed Bank List up to 18
The Test Drive: Leasing or Buying a HR IT Platform
Double Digits: Bank Closings up to 11 in 2011
FCIC Releases Report on the Causes of the Financial Crisis
Another One Bites the Dust: Regulators Close 4 Banks
On Notice: FDIC Issues Rule for Temp Unlimited Deposit Insurance
2011 Failed Bank List Up to 3
Stick 'Em Up!
Time for a Tune-Up: The Necessity of a HR Audit
Visa Instituting Two-Tiered Debit Card Interchange Structure
The First Failed Banks of 2011
The Law on Your Side: Understanding HR Regulations in 2011
No Respite from RESPA