Saturday, September 21, 2019

Painting a Masterpiece: The Art of the ALLL Reserve

Posted by OnCourse Staff January 10, 2011 10:26am

Photo Credit: Johnny Berg

How do we define an adequate level of ALLL reserve? Alas, that is the new $64 question in the banking industry. The ALLL Reserve is apparently like a priceless art piece, which is subject to significant scrutiny and different interpretations.   

Based on recent regulatory emphasis, the changes in the economic climate, the uncertainty in the real estate market and the economy have all cumulated into the most confusing and erratic environment regarding the establishment of a bank's ALLL Reserve. The regulatory scrutiny has been tremendous.  Of course, along with such scrutiny brings an element of inconsistency which is derived primarily by the regulatory desire to increase the ALLL Reserve.  Such desire is often in direct conflict with the Bank's, whose main objective is to not only maintain an adequate reserve balance but also to preserve earnings and capital levels.

The 2006 Inter-agency Policy Statement on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses combines with other regulatory and accounting directives to establish guidelines and requirements for the accounting of projected loan losses and determining loan loss reserves.

So what's the problem? Where does this subjectivity come from? The problem is that these requirements and guidelines are themselves pieces of art subject to varying interpretations. One would think that all of these regulations would be able to create a concise and simple formula that all parties could be content with.  But then we'd have nothing to complain about.  Now at least we can blame someone else who doesn't see the glass as half full and insists that it's half empty.

The directives require banks to implement a consistent and verifiable method for determining ALLL - and be able to demonstrate that their process results in a reasonable and justifiable loan loss reserve. The Inter-agency policy requires banks to approach the ALLL reserve calculation using two distinct perspectives, the guidelines of using Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 5 (Accounting for Contingencies, for grouped loans) and FAS No. 114 (Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, for individual loans).

To complicate matters further, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recently released the Accounting Standards Codification.  So now we all we have to get used to saying ASC 450 for FAS 5 and ASC 310 for FAS 114. This happened, of course, just as we all discovered that there's indeed a FAS114. I didn't know they went that high. So I'll try to use them going forward in this blog, although I can't promise that I will be able to correctly. 

But as is any good art form, the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The issue in many cases that I see is not even the dollar amount of the ALL reserve, but being able to substantiate it.

The ASC 450 (I got it right, FAS 5) is perhaps where the greatest challenge with respect to documentation comes in.  The guidance tells you the following:

  • The Bank should group its loans according to type or homogeneous pools of similar risk characteristics. That's easy enough. The practice seems to allow the use of call report categories. Unless a Bank has maintained better historical records, it is difficult to get prior historical quantitative data relevant to charge-offs or delinquency trend by any other sub categories.
  • The Bank must calculate its historical loss rate, based on the more recent history, for each of these loan pools. Of importance here and throughout its process to determine ALLL, the Bank must document the method it uses to establish its loan pool historical loss rates. Of course I modified the guidance here a bit. The Interagency guidance doesn't really say that a bank must use the more recent history. This is just something the regulators started to enforce on their own. The understanding being that since there have been more charge-offs in recent history compared to the past, the use of the recent two year history (as opposed to a five year history) would yield a higher charge-off rate, hence a higher reserve.

I wonder what will happen when the charge offs start to decline - will we have to revert back to a five year history? Hmmm!

  • The Bank must adjust those historical loss ratios for internal and external qualitative factors. This is where I think most banks fumble. This is not so easy to justify, quantify or document. I can only suggest that a bank read the Interagency guidance. It is actually pretty clear in identifying the qualitative factors that should be used. Convert them into a questionnaire of sort, and assess a risk rating for each factor. The resulting risk rating of each factor can then be used to dial up or down the historical loss percentage.
  • The Bank must be able to identify loan loss trends as well as additional issues or factors that affect the quality or risk assessment of its loan pools. I read this as being a requirement to further alter the adjusted historical loss rate by an assessment of the delinquency or concentration risk trend. Regulators have also mandated that classified for each homogenous pools be further segregated, and those loans be reserved using an even higher adjusted historical loss percentage. This last part I couldn't find anywhere in the Interagency guideline.

I'm sure it's there somewhere. I need glasses but have just been pretending that I don't. When I get my new glasses and find it, I'll let you know.

  • The Bank must calculate the ALLL for each loan pool to determine its total amount of loan loss reserves. This is the easiest part. Once we have the adjusted historical loss percentage we can easily apply it to the outstanding loan balance for each loan. Wait! Do I include the off balance sheet items and apply it to the portion of loan balances for which I have already performed an ASC 310 (yup, it's FAS114) review?

Off balance sheet items (i.e. unfunded credit lines, loan commitments, etc.) - if you follow the interagency and GAAP guideline, the answer would be no.  The regulatory emphasis says yes.  So I would say YES.

In the case of loans for which an ASC 310 impairment measurement review has been performed (these would be loans which you have determined are impaired and have measured the potential impairment, even if it is none) - if you follow the Interagency guideline the answer is no. The regulatory emphasis says maybe, it depends.

So what do I say? In a bit of defiance, I say "no".  The inconsistency from the regulators, I believe, stems from their confidence level on the bank's ASC 310 review process. The stronger and more objective the process, the more they are inclined to agree with me (imagine that). We'll discuss more of that in Part 2 of this masterpiece of a blog (I know you can't wait).

So to summarize, the ASC 450 reserve balance is derived by:

  • Take your more recent historical loss percentage for each pool of loans (most likely two years, but that could change at any time) and adjust it by the risk assessment for the qualitative factors listed in the Interagency policy.
  • The adjustment for these qualitative factors needs to be documented through some sort of an internal/external assessment
  • The adjusted historical percentage after the adjustment for the qualitative factors can be further adjusted for delinquency and concentration risk for each loan pool (or may not if you don't want to, just a suggestion)
  • But you should, even though not required to according to the Interagency policy, further escalate the adjusted, adjusted historical loss percentage for the classified portion of the loans for each loan pools.
  • Now we have the adjusted, adjusted and further adjusted historical loss percentage which we can apply to the outstanding loan pools.
  • You should include the off balance sheet items for each loan pool (you don't have to if you don't want to, but you can fight with the regulators yourself)
  • I wouldn't include the loans for which you have performed a valid ASC 310 impairment review. I would make sure that my review process for ASC 310 is robust. How does one accomplish that? We'll touch upon that in Part 2

So now you can be the new Picasso.  Good Luck.

(Read Part 2, "Cracking the Code: How to Develop the Right FAS 114 Methodology" here)

Comments

Add a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.



 Image

OnCourse Staff

The OnCourse writing staff work to keep you informed about the most pertinent financial industry news of the moment



OnCourse Staff's Posts Subscribe to RSS Feed



Flood Coverage – Still a Hot Regulatory Issue
Interagency Statement on Sharing BSA Resources and Challenges
New Jersey's Corporate Business Tax Legislation: A Look at the Impact for Banks
Correspondent Banking: The Challenges of Data Transparency
Regulation E and Business Account Errors
Controls over Employee and Officer T&E Expenses
Is Regulation CC Put on the Back Burner?
Training – An Investment and Risk Management Tool
Are You Gambling with Your BSA Program?
The Case of Foreign Banks and Heightened Scrutiny
IRS and New Jersey Tax Audits of Banks
State Taxation of Financial Institutions in Today's Environment
Does your 401(k) Plan need an Audit?
De-Risking of Foreign Correspondent Banks
Same Day ACH Credits – Phase One
FinCEN Finalizes Ruling on Beneficial Ownership and Ongoing Customer Due Diligence
Keep an Eye On Your Chip!
Is the IRS Status of your Defined Benefit plan in Jeopardy?
The Dilemma of Banking Medical Marijuana Businesses and Other Indirect Risks
Is your Institution Monitoring Working Capital Lines of Credit?
Financial Reporting and Regulatory Update on the Horizon
BSA/AML Training: Is your program effective?
Planning in a Consolidating Banking Industry
To opt-out or not to opt-out, that is the question – A reminder on March 31, 2015 Call Report, Schedule RC-R, item 3.a
Anti-Money Laundering – The Age of Technology
Top Compliance Topics Discussed at the NJ Bankers Compliance University
Some tips and tricks for dealing with Regulatory Examinations
Updated Regulation E Booklet from the OCC!
Is Flood Disaster Still on the Heat Map?
Have You Implemented Your Plan yet?
FDIC Consumer Newsletter
More Flood Insurance Changes...
Same Sex Married Couples - Ensuring Equal Treatment – Announcement from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Truth in Lending (Regulation Z) Annual Threshold Adjustments (CARD ACT, HOEPA and ATR/QM)
FFIEC Releases Revised BSA/AML Examination Manual: So what’s new?
OFAC Consolidates Non-SDN Listings
Coping with HOPA
Coping with the CFPB’s Ability-to-Repay Rule
ABA Survey on Impact of Dodd Frank Compliance
ABA Mortgage Origination Deskbook
Who handles Your Dormant Accounts?
Appraisal Disclosure Rule
Cybercriminals Broaden their Attacks in Social Networks
The Importance of Segregating a Bank’s Credit Function from its Lending Function
Appraisal Management Companies in Regulatory Crosshairs
All About the Home Owners Protection Act
Requesting Current Financial Information
Countdown to Windows XP End of Life and Support: Are you still at Risk?
314(b) Distinct Advantages for Financial Institutions
Where is the Document?
Building a Better Hen House
Ready the Ramparts! : IT Security and the Modern Bank
The Credit -- Er, IT Crisis?
Keeping the Balance: IT Security and the Org Chart
IT Security: "IT's" About Process
Wag the Dog
Consumerization of Technology and its influence on Information Security
Detective, Reactive and Preventive: Evolving Your IT Security
Do You Know The Security Features of the New $100 Bill?
Segregation of Duties for Wire Transfer Processing
How do you charge Early Withdrawal Fees on Time Deposits?
Do you still offer NOW Accounts?
Policy Changes Required – Do you Wait until Annual Approval?
Summarizing ACAMS White Paper on EDD and AML Risk Assessments (Industry Survey)
ACAMS to provide Free Webinar
ACBB Changes its Name
Who Do You Give Cash to?
ABA Briefing to Help Banks Address Cyber-security Threats
The OCC Issues Booklet: “A Common Sense Approach to Community Banking”
Safe Deposit Box Contents are not insured – But They COULD Be!
Allowance for Loan Loss Tips and Tricks
FDIC Can Review New Products
Let’s Talk About Overdrafts!
Community Banks Slowly Warm Up to Private Student Loans
Has your Bank updated the Adverse Action Notice?
Regulation E and NACHA Rules: When you Want to Stop Payment on a Recurring Debit
CFPB Stands Up Against Poor Debt Collection Practices
Don’t Forget the Small Stuff
Double Endorsed Checks: What is the Risk?
Social Media – Will the Regulators Do Spot Checks?
How Does Your Bank Handle Customer Requested Maintenance Changes?
OCC Releases Booklet on "Common Sense" Community Banking
New SAR Filing Updates
Is your BSA/AML automated monitoring system up to par?
The Importance of BSA Training
Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) introduces the OFAC SDN Fuzzy Logic Search Tool
Filing the New CTR Forms: What you need to Know
FFIEC Proposed Risk Management Guidance on Social Media: Beware and Prepare
Solutions to Reducing Dormant Accounts at Your Institution
Pandemic Preparedness: Are you testing your Pandemic Plan?
Regulation E Foreign Remittance Rules
FFIEC issues revised “Supervision of Technology Service Providers” booklet
Expiration of Unlimited Deposit Insurance for NIBTAs
Is Your Institution's Marketing UDAAP Compliant?
What is Enterprise Risk Management?
New OCC Guidance Released on Investor Owned Properties
Electronic Work Papers - Why P&G Made the Switch
OCC to Toughen Exams in Response to United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations
Clarifying Regulatory Obligations Regarding Continuing Activity SAR Filings
Federal Regulatory Agencies Proposal New Rule
Risk management - Smaller institutions and the benefits of ERM
Strengthening Your Loan Maintenance Monitoring
New Lending Proposal from CFPB
FDIC Reaches Settlement on Overdraft Fees
FRB Guidance on Foreclosures
Loan Denials and Withdrawals – Tips to Sure Up your Process
Regulation O – 5 Easy ways to avoid violations
The Summer of CFPB Proposals
Community Lenders Seize Market Share From Big Banks by Using Advanced Online Lending Technology
Dodd-Frank Rule to Change Legal Lending Limit Monitoring Requirements
The ABCs of a TDR
Supreme Court ruling for the Freeman, et al. v. Quicken Loans, Inc case
New FinCEN Guidance for CTR Aggregation for Businesses with Common Ownership (FIN – 2012 –G001)
Senior member of House of Financial Services Committee Introduces Overdraft Protection Act
FinCEN is looking to streamline the financial institution reporting process by issuing mandatory E-filing reporting requirements.
Curry: Operational Risk Now OCC’s Top Concern
JOBS Act Client Alert - Rules 506 of Regulation D
New Rules Proposal for Servicers Coming from the CFPB
Wall Street Receives Volcker Rule Clarity
De-stressing with stress testing
Banks Participate in Information Sharing to Battle Online Theft
IT security: Is your program still effective?
Banking Solutions: ALLL and GAAP in Agreement
How are the most recent regulatory enforcement trends that banks are facing today affecting internal audit? Why?
What are the most recent regulatory enforcement trends that banks are facing today?
Mobile banking: How do we get there?
UBS further struggles with $2 Billion loss by Rogue Trader
Capital One Becomes Dodd-Frank Test as Nation’s Fifth Largest Bank
Community Banks to receive US Funding for Small Businesses
FDIC fields questions about overdraft guidance
Negligent Hiring – A mistake can cost more than just money!
Regulatory Burden – Managing the Pain
From Embezzlement to Imprisonment: Former Citigroup employee faces charges with $19.2 million in bank fraud
TDR or Not to TDR …Much Ado about Nothing?
Finding the Right Hire
Model behavior: Is your ALM model capturing your bank’s risks?
ALLL best practices: Pay attention to qualitative factors
Abandoned Property Law, and its new New York State of Mind
Consumerization of Technology and its influence on Information Security
FDIC releases Provisions on Dodd-Frank to help Community Banks
Social Media in the Employment Arena – It Gets Funky!
The Proof is in the Pudding: Affects of Dodd-Frank on Community Banks
Banks and Businesses get "swiped" over Fees
A little bit of this, and a little bit of that: Fed Unveils list of Banks Helped during Financial Crisis of 2008
IT Security: "IT's" About Process
To Test or Not to Test; That is the Question
2011 Failed Bank List Hits 25
Wag the Dog
Committee on Financial Services to Hold Hearing on the Effects of Dodd-Frank on Small Biz and Banks Today
2011 Failed Bank List up to 18
A Culture of Whatever: On the Path to Proper Governance
The Test Drive: Leasing or Buying a HR IT Platform
Detective, Reactive and Preventive: Evolving Your IT Security
Cracking the ALLL Code: How to Develop the Right FAS 114 Methodology
Double Digits: Bank Closings up to 11 in 2011
FCIC Releases Report on the Causes of the Financial Crisis
Part of the In Crowd: Thoughts on the Dodd-Frank Act
Another One Bites the Dust: Regulators Close 4 Banks
Keeping the Balance: IT Security and the Org Chart
On Notice: FDIC Issues Rule for Temp Unlimited Deposit Insurance
2011 Failed Bank List Up to 3
Welcome to OnCourse
Stick 'Em Up!
Time for a Tune-Up: The Necessity of a HR Audit
Visa Instituting Two-Tiered Debit Card Interchange Structure
The First Failed Banks of 2011
The Credit -- Er, IT Crisis?
Painting a Masterpiece: The Art of the ALLL Reserve
The Law on Your Side: Understanding HR Regulations in 2011
Building a Better Hen House
Ready the Ramparts! : IT Security and the Modern Bank
No Respite from RESPA