Thursday, June 20, 2019

More Flood Insurance Changes...

Posted by Sharon February 12, 2015 9:36am

Photo Credit:

On July 6, 2012, the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (“B-W Act”) became law. The B-W Act made several substantial changes to the flood insurance rules, many of which affected lenders. While most provisions were effective only after implementing regulations are written, two major provisions of the B-W Act, one regarding the force placement of flood insurance and the other increasing the civil money penalties for violations of the flood insurance rules, became effective immediately upon enactment. Specifically, those requirements are:

  • The lender may charge the borrower for premiums or fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide sufficient coverage amount
  • The lender or servicer, within 30 days of receiving a confirmation of a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage, is required to terminate any force placed insurance and refund to the borrower all force placed insurance premiums and any related fees paid for by the borrower during any period of overlap between the borrower's policy and the force placed policy
  • A lender or servicer must accept as confirmation of a borrower's existing flood insurance policy a declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity and contact information for the insurance company or agent
  • The maximum civil money penalty for a Flood Disaster Protection Act violation was increased from $350 to $2,000, and the penalty cap per year went away

Then, on March 29, 2013, the regulatory Agencies issued an interagency statement that the above changes were indeed the Agencies' position on Biggert-Waters. The Agencies then identified three other significant provisions of the B-W Act affecting lenders that would not be effective until implementing regulations were issued.

Those three provisions were:

  • The requirement that lenders provide borrowers a notice of the availability of private flood insurance as well as insurance under the NFIP and that federally regulated lenders are required to accept private flood insurance
  • That lenders disclose to borrowers information about the National Flood Insurance Program
  • That lenders, with some exceptions, establish escrows for flood insurance for all covered loans in existence or consummated after July 6, 2014

As to the escrow requirement, the Agencies stated, "It is the Agencies position that this provision of the Act is not effective until regulations are issued. The Agencies intend to publish escrow regulations in sufficient time for the industry to implement them prior to July 2014."

On October 30, 2013, the Agencies published in the Federal Register a "Joint Notice of Proposed Rule Making on Loans in Areas Having Special Flood Hazards."  It encompassed the B-W Act's provisions that required regulatory implementation with one exception. That exception was an amendment to RESPA requiring that a section be added to the Special Information Booklet regarding flood insurance. Because RESPA is now under the jurisdiction of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, that change must be enacted by the CFPB. To date, the change has not been addressed.

The joint notice proposed regulations for the acceptance of private flood insurance, and the escrow requirements provide for an exemption for certain institutions with less than $1 billion in assets. The proposal includes the timing requirements for requiring escrow for residential improved real estate, including an exemption for existing policies where escrow wouldn't be required until the flood insurance policy renewal. Additionally, the proposal includes model forms to meet the notice requirements.  The proposed effective date was in keeping with the B-W Act, July 6, 2014, but nothing has been finalized.

The flood insurance rate increases as a result of the B-W Act were quite cumbersome.  For this and other reasons, in March 2014, Congress stepped in and passed the Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act (“HFIAA”) which put on hold many of the premium increases in flood insurance that were required by Biggert Waters. The HFIAA also provided for one key requirement, “mandatory escrowing”, to answer the million dollar question: What should a lender do if there is no further guidance from the regulatory agencies before July? 

Under the Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act, the B-W Act requirement regarding escrow for flood insurance on covered loans come July 6, 2014, was repealed. Instead, HFIAA requires the Agencies to implement regulations to address the B-W Act and amendments to it under HFIAA, including the escrow and notice requirements with an effective date of January 1, 2016.  

Long story short, and what this all boils down to, is they have to write the regulations first, and the effective date is extended.


It appears that the Agencies are now going back over the October proposal to determine what potential changes must be made to coincide with the amended requirements of Biggert-Waters through the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act.  The revised proposal is expected in the coming months, with hopes of sooner rather than later. 


Add a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.


Sharon Geiger

Senior Quality Control and Review Specialist

Sharon Geiger has 27 years banking experience, 21 of which have been involved in internal audit. She has extensive knowledge of all aspects of the banking industry, with a particular emphasis on regulatory compliance and identifying risks and controls. As QCR Specialist, she performs Quality Control Reviews to ensure all workpapers and reports are completed in compliance with the firm's standards.

Sharon's Posts Subscribe to RSS Feed

Flood Coverage – Still a Hot Regulatory Issue
Regulation E and Business Account Errors
Controls over Employee and Officer T&E Expenses
Is Regulation CC Put on the Back Burner?
Keep an Eye On Your Chip!
Top Compliance Topics Discussed at the NJ Bankers Compliance University
Some tips and tricks for dealing with Regulatory Examinations
Updated Regulation E Booklet from the OCC!
Is Flood Disaster Still on the Heat Map?
Have You Implemented Your Plan yet?
FDIC Consumer Newsletter
More Flood Insurance Changes...
Same Sex Married Couples - Ensuring Equal Treatment – Announcement from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Truth in Lending (Regulation Z) Annual Threshold Adjustments (CARD ACT, HOEPA and ATR/QM)
ABA Survey on Impact of Dodd Frank Compliance
ABA Mortgage Origination Deskbook
Who handles Your Dormant Accounts?
How do you charge Early Withdrawal Fees on Time Deposits?
Do you still offer NOW Accounts?
Policy Changes Required – Do you Wait until Annual Approval?
ACAMS to provide Free Webinar
ACBB Changes its Name
Who Do You Give Cash to?
ABA Briefing to Help Banks Address Cyber-security Threats
The OCC Issues Booklet: “A Common Sense Approach to Community Banking”
Safe Deposit Box Contents are not insured – But They COULD Be!
FDIC Can Review New Products
Let’s Talk About Overdrafts!
Regulation E and NACHA Rules: When you Want to Stop Payment on a Recurring Debit
CFPB Stands Up Against Poor Debt Collection Practices
Don’t Forget the Small Stuff
Double Endorsed Checks: What is the Risk?
Social Media – Will the Regulators Do Spot Checks?
Solutions to Reducing Dormant Accounts at Your Institution
Regulation E Foreign Remittance Rules
Expiration of Unlimited Deposit Insurance for NIBTAs
Regulation O – 5 Easy ways to avoid violations