Saturday, August 24, 2019

All About the Home Owners Protection Act

Posted by OnCourse Staff April 9, 2014 2:17pm

Photo Credit: freedigitalphotos.net

On February 25, 2014, the FDIC has released its revised interagency consumer compliance exam procedures for the mortgage rules that became effective with Dodd-Frank Act. The focus of the issuance of the procedures is part of the FDIC's efforts to inform affected banks about bank regulatory developments in hopes of creating a better dialogue between the FDIC and the institutions it monitors. As a firm, our various department heads and Subject Matter Experts have reviewed the procedures to relay to our clients the areas of interest from the release.

An area that the procedures appear to be revamped under the “Lending Compliance Risk” section of the procedures is the Home Owners Protection Act (HOPA), also known as the “PMI Cancellation Act” because the entire Regulation is based around consumers cancelling their PMI insurance.

Personal Mortgage Insurance (or PMI) is a type of indemnity that protects lenders from the risk of default and foreclosure. PMI allows prospective borrowers who for whatever reason do not provide noteworthy down payments to obtain mortgage financing at affordable rates. PMI is used primarily to grant loans where the loan to value ratio exceeds eighty percent, thus causing a higher risk for the lending institution. With the insurance in place, a lender is better positioned to recoup some of the costs that are accrued when a property is foreclosed upon, and the lender attempts to resell it. Interest payments, taxes, insurance, and other expenses involved can be covered.

The problem (one of several noted here) arises if it is perceived the lender is charging what can be considered “excessive” PMI, as it benefits only the lender, and leaves the consumer with a higher payment. Another major issue is that if a homeowner has experienced problems in trying to cancel PMI.  Because there were wide arrays of bank and lender criteria for cancelling PMI during the recent crisis, it became a major issue.  The Act, once established, protects consumers by disallowing PMI coverage that was “life of loan” (in other words, no termination, regardless of LTV risk). It also clears the muddied waters by laying out uniform procedures for both cancellation and termination of PMI policies.

By reviewing the guidance and updated procedures, we noted several areas that are sure to be a part of any upcoming exam.

  • The examiners will be ensuring that internal controls in place to adequately monitor HOPA. This could be performed though reviewing policies and procedures, ensuring loan file documentation is accurate,  sufficient training is in place to facilitate HOPA compliance,  adequate training is in place, and any software product is up to the job of HOPA monitoring. There may be other areas that are dug into, but essentially, those practices are the life blood of any satisfactory compliance function. It may be a prudent time to review your HOPA controls to ensure you have the proper tools in place for the additional scrutiny that may be coming. 
  • A great  deal of this examination  will cover two types of sampling – those mortgages that have recently obtained PMI, and those that have had it for a while,  and  could potentially be eligible for cancellation. These samples will include those serviced by the bank, not just those within the portfolio.  The examiners will be ensuring that written initial disclosures for fixed and adjustable rate residential mortgage transactions that require PMI reflect the HOPA requirements and are properly distributed to a consumer.

The forms tested can include the following:

Initial disclosures for:

  1. fixed rate mortgage
  2. adjustable rate mortgages;
  3. high risk loans
  4. lender-paid mortgage insurance

Annual notices for:

  1. fixed and adjustable rate mortgages
  2. high-risk loans
  3. existing residential mortgages.
Notices of:
  1. cancellation
  2. termination
  3. grounds for not canceling PMI
  4. grounds for not terminating PMI
  5. cancellation date for adjustable rate mortgages
  6. termination for lender paid mortgage insurance
Field examiners will be utilizing the sample they picked to ensure that borrowers are not charged for any of the required notifications or disclosures that have to be issued because of HOPA.

Again, this is a good time to ensure that any disclosures or documents issued in regard to PMI are up to date and meet all regulatory requirements.

  • The examiners will likely review a sample of recent written requests (if any) from borrowers to cancel their private mortgage insurance (PMI).  In this area, they will ensure that the bank has an established process in place to handle such requests. A strong process is required for consumer based cancellation request, as this was the main focal point of consumer complaints in the past.  Clearly outlined procedures of what is required of a borrower (updated appraisal, etc.) in order to facilitate this in a timely manner are a must. This can save an institution from complaints of discrimination or bad business practices.
  • They will also review a sample of “non-high risk” PMI residential mortgage transactions where the borrower did not request cancellation. They will test loans that have reached a 78% or lower LTV ratio based on the original value of the property, amortization schedules and that are current.  They will then verify that the PMI was terminated according to HOPA, and in a timely manner.
  • If applicable, they will be testing any defined “high risk” PMI residential mortgage transactions that have reached a 77% or lower LTV based on the original value of the property.  They will ensure that the PMI was cancelled timely based on the appropriate amortization schedule.
  • Finally, they will review loans that have had PMI canceled or terminated.  For PMI loans canceled upon the borrowers’ requests.  In such instances, they will ensure that the lender did not collect PMI payment(s) beyond 30 days of the borrower satisfying the evidence and certification requirements to cancel PMI. This also applies for loans that were automatically terminated due to amortization. This is where an effective tickler or software system comes into play, and why the regulators require that this be monitored as an effective control.

As you can see, the examination process can be become quite detailed in its implementation. Many institutions have mitigated the risk of this area by limiting these types of high LTV ratio loans in their portfolio.  If not, a thorough review of all controls and documents related to HOPA should be performed in a timely manner, (either internally or by an appropriate third party) and periodically going forward in a effort to keep atop of an ever changing regulatory environment.

 

Comments

Add a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.



 Image

OnCourse Staff

The OnCourse writing staff work to keep you informed about the most pertinent financial industry news of the moment



OnCourse Staff's Posts Subscribe to RSS Feed



Flood Coverage – Still a Hot Regulatory Issue
Interagency Statement on Sharing BSA Resources and Challenges
New Jersey's Corporate Business Tax Legislation: A Look at the Impact for Banks
Correspondent Banking: The Challenges of Data Transparency
Regulation E and Business Account Errors
Controls over Employee and Officer T&E Expenses
Is Regulation CC Put on the Back Burner?
Training – An Investment and Risk Management Tool
Are You Gambling with Your BSA Program?
The Case of Foreign Banks and Heightened Scrutiny
IRS and New Jersey Tax Audits of Banks
State Taxation of Financial Institutions in Today's Environment
Does your 401(k) Plan need an Audit?
De-Risking of Foreign Correspondent Banks
Same Day ACH Credits – Phase One
FinCEN Finalizes Ruling on Beneficial Ownership and Ongoing Customer Due Diligence
Keep an Eye On Your Chip!
Is the IRS Status of your Defined Benefit plan in Jeopardy?
The Dilemma of Banking Medical Marijuana Businesses and Other Indirect Risks
Is your Institution Monitoring Working Capital Lines of Credit?
Financial Reporting and Regulatory Update on the Horizon
BSA/AML Training: Is your program effective?
Planning in a Consolidating Banking Industry
To opt-out or not to opt-out, that is the question – A reminder on March 31, 2015 Call Report, Schedule RC-R, item 3.a
Anti-Money Laundering – The Age of Technology
Top Compliance Topics Discussed at the NJ Bankers Compliance University
Some tips and tricks for dealing with Regulatory Examinations
Updated Regulation E Booklet from the OCC!
Is Flood Disaster Still on the Heat Map?
Have You Implemented Your Plan yet?
FDIC Consumer Newsletter
More Flood Insurance Changes...
Same Sex Married Couples - Ensuring Equal Treatment – Announcement from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Truth in Lending (Regulation Z) Annual Threshold Adjustments (CARD ACT, HOEPA and ATR/QM)
FFIEC Releases Revised BSA/AML Examination Manual: So what’s new?
OFAC Consolidates Non-SDN Listings
Coping with HOPA
Coping with the CFPB’s Ability-to-Repay Rule
ABA Survey on Impact of Dodd Frank Compliance
ABA Mortgage Origination Deskbook
Who handles Your Dormant Accounts?
Appraisal Disclosure Rule
Cybercriminals Broaden their Attacks in Social Networks
The Importance of Segregating a Bank’s Credit Function from its Lending Function
Appraisal Management Companies in Regulatory Crosshairs
All About the Home Owners Protection Act
Requesting Current Financial Information
Countdown to Windows XP End of Life and Support: Are you still at Risk?
314(b) Distinct Advantages for Financial Institutions
Where is the Document?
Building a Better Hen House
Ready the Ramparts! : IT Security and the Modern Bank
The Credit -- Er, IT Crisis?
Keeping the Balance: IT Security and the Org Chart
IT Security: "IT's" About Process
Wag the Dog
Consumerization of Technology and its influence on Information Security
Detective, Reactive and Preventive: Evolving Your IT Security
Do You Know The Security Features of the New $100 Bill?
Segregation of Duties for Wire Transfer Processing
How do you charge Early Withdrawal Fees on Time Deposits?
Do you still offer NOW Accounts?
Policy Changes Required – Do you Wait until Annual Approval?
Summarizing ACAMS White Paper on EDD and AML Risk Assessments (Industry Survey)
ACAMS to provide Free Webinar
ACBB Changes its Name
Who Do You Give Cash to?
ABA Briefing to Help Banks Address Cyber-security Threats
The OCC Issues Booklet: “A Common Sense Approach to Community Banking”
Safe Deposit Box Contents are not insured – But They COULD Be!
Allowance for Loan Loss Tips and Tricks
FDIC Can Review New Products
Let’s Talk About Overdrafts!
Community Banks Slowly Warm Up to Private Student Loans
Has your Bank updated the Adverse Action Notice?
Regulation E and NACHA Rules: When you Want to Stop Payment on a Recurring Debit
CFPB Stands Up Against Poor Debt Collection Practices
Don’t Forget the Small Stuff
Double Endorsed Checks: What is the Risk?
Social Media – Will the Regulators Do Spot Checks?
How Does Your Bank Handle Customer Requested Maintenance Changes?
OCC Releases Booklet on "Common Sense" Community Banking
New SAR Filing Updates
Is your BSA/AML automated monitoring system up to par?
The Importance of BSA Training
Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) introduces the OFAC SDN Fuzzy Logic Search Tool
Filing the New CTR Forms: What you need to Know
FFIEC Proposed Risk Management Guidance on Social Media: Beware and Prepare
Solutions to Reducing Dormant Accounts at Your Institution
Pandemic Preparedness: Are you testing your Pandemic Plan?
Regulation E Foreign Remittance Rules
FFIEC issues revised “Supervision of Technology Service Providers” booklet
Expiration of Unlimited Deposit Insurance for NIBTAs
Is Your Institution's Marketing UDAAP Compliant?
What is Enterprise Risk Management?
New OCC Guidance Released on Investor Owned Properties
Electronic Work Papers - Why P&G Made the Switch
OCC to Toughen Exams in Response to United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations
Clarifying Regulatory Obligations Regarding Continuing Activity SAR Filings
Federal Regulatory Agencies Proposal New Rule
Risk management - Smaller institutions and the benefits of ERM
Strengthening Your Loan Maintenance Monitoring
New Lending Proposal from CFPB
FDIC Reaches Settlement on Overdraft Fees
FRB Guidance on Foreclosures
Loan Denials and Withdrawals – Tips to Sure Up your Process
Regulation O – 5 Easy ways to avoid violations
The Summer of CFPB Proposals
Community Lenders Seize Market Share From Big Banks by Using Advanced Online Lending Technology
Dodd-Frank Rule to Change Legal Lending Limit Monitoring Requirements
The ABCs of a TDR
Supreme Court ruling for the Freeman, et al. v. Quicken Loans, Inc case
New FinCEN Guidance for CTR Aggregation for Businesses with Common Ownership (FIN – 2012 –G001)
Senior member of House of Financial Services Committee Introduces Overdraft Protection Act
FinCEN is looking to streamline the financial institution reporting process by issuing mandatory E-filing reporting requirements.
Curry: Operational Risk Now OCC’s Top Concern
JOBS Act Client Alert - Rules 506 of Regulation D
New Rules Proposal for Servicers Coming from the CFPB
Wall Street Receives Volcker Rule Clarity
De-stressing with stress testing
Banks Participate in Information Sharing to Battle Online Theft
IT security: Is your program still effective?
Banking Solutions: ALLL and GAAP in Agreement
How are the most recent regulatory enforcement trends that banks are facing today affecting internal audit? Why?
What are the most recent regulatory enforcement trends that banks are facing today?
Mobile banking: How do we get there?
UBS further struggles with $2 Billion loss by Rogue Trader
Capital One Becomes Dodd-Frank Test as Nation’s Fifth Largest Bank
Community Banks to receive US Funding for Small Businesses
FDIC fields questions about overdraft guidance
Negligent Hiring – A mistake can cost more than just money!
Regulatory Burden – Managing the Pain
From Embezzlement to Imprisonment: Former Citigroup employee faces charges with $19.2 million in bank fraud
TDR or Not to TDR …Much Ado about Nothing?
Finding the Right Hire
Model behavior: Is your ALM model capturing your bank’s risks?
ALLL best practices: Pay attention to qualitative factors
Abandoned Property Law, and its new New York State of Mind
Consumerization of Technology and its influence on Information Security
FDIC releases Provisions on Dodd-Frank to help Community Banks
Social Media in the Employment Arena – It Gets Funky!
The Proof is in the Pudding: Affects of Dodd-Frank on Community Banks
Banks and Businesses get "swiped" over Fees
A little bit of this, and a little bit of that: Fed Unveils list of Banks Helped during Financial Crisis of 2008
IT Security: "IT's" About Process
To Test or Not to Test; That is the Question
2011 Failed Bank List Hits 25
Wag the Dog
Committee on Financial Services to Hold Hearing on the Effects of Dodd-Frank on Small Biz and Banks Today
2011 Failed Bank List up to 18
A Culture of Whatever: On the Path to Proper Governance
The Test Drive: Leasing or Buying a HR IT Platform
Detective, Reactive and Preventive: Evolving Your IT Security
Cracking the ALLL Code: How to Develop the Right FAS 114 Methodology
Double Digits: Bank Closings up to 11 in 2011
FCIC Releases Report on the Causes of the Financial Crisis
Part of the In Crowd: Thoughts on the Dodd-Frank Act
Another One Bites the Dust: Regulators Close 4 Banks
Keeping the Balance: IT Security and the Org Chart
On Notice: FDIC Issues Rule for Temp Unlimited Deposit Insurance
2011 Failed Bank List Up to 3
Welcome to OnCourse
Stick 'Em Up!
Time for a Tune-Up: The Necessity of a HR Audit
Visa Instituting Two-Tiered Debit Card Interchange Structure
The First Failed Banks of 2011
The Credit -- Er, IT Crisis?
Painting a Masterpiece: The Art of the ALLL Reserve
The Law on Your Side: Understanding HR Regulations in 2011
Building a Better Hen House
Ready the Ramparts! : IT Security and the Modern Bank
No Respite from RESPA